Has Kahli broken the strict codes of the liberal intelligencia? Tolerance and diversity is a strange bedfellow for the liberal elite who claim that all beliefs are equally valid.
It seems the latest victim is Khali Best. Did he say that there is only one name under heaven by which men may be saved? Looking to the authority of the Bible is strictly off limits. Maybe he made mention of the fact that men and women are created in the image God, with equal value dignity and worth, the same but different. That would be a terrible contravention. The last thing the BBC needs is a loose canon suggesting that somehow a monogamous marriage between a man and woman is the safe, healthy and right place to bring up children.
What about being old fashioned ghetto rapper who speaks his mind of what he believes regarding sex, men, women and life? A short period of correctional training, establishing correct patterns of thought for Mr Best before he is invited back into the multi cultural world of the BBC is necessary. Unless he responds to the agenda like the Russell Brands of the world then no more mainstream for you my son.
What’s the point in engaging with people who claim atheistic convictions? If their worldview is such that they deny the God who gave them the very breath, reason and senses they are employing to deny what they know but suppress that truth, is there any purpose? The bible explains that whatever they believe, they will be without excuse. God’s divine nature eternal power is apparent through his creation.
From a human perspective there is no point engaging. If Cyril Smith didn’t repent he is paying the price for his perversions. However, that’s not the end. For God is rich in mercy and while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. He gave his life for all the unbelievers, rapists, atheistic abortionists, liars and perverts. Justice and mercy cannot co-exists from a human perspective but God, the creator of all things, who is truth, and love, can forgive all who truly repent.
The religion of Pastafarianism, followers of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM), has been thought of as make believe, a story akin to the tooth fairy or Santa. It has no history, no foundation in knowledge and truth and was a construct of a high school student in the US who applied his presuppositions about the origins of the universe, life, the human conscience, and the laws of science, maths and logic.
However, there is is a formula, passively accepted by millions, supporting the FSM. It has credibility amongst the atheistic and naturalistic communities and surprisingly, the supposed strict empiricist community. These folks accept the formula that a really really long long time + chance + nothing = everything (RRLLT+C+N=E). Following this reason then the FSM is a credible god.
Enough people now accept that nothing created everything, through the auspices of a big explosion that unlike every explosion since, didn’t produce chaos but order and design. The immaterial created the material, none-life created life. Therefore the laws of logic, and reason can be by-passed to believe in the FSM, after all it works for the religion of atheism and the religion of agnosticism (I don’t know/can’t know).
Of course there is an alternative and that’s to listen to your conscience, con (with) science (knowledge) repent and believe the Gospel.
Are you seriously going to dismiss thousands of years of biblical history founded on the life and works of Jesus Christ and exchange it for irrationality? Do you have faith and trust in scientists and philosophers whose theories are forever changing? I mean seriously. Do you cherish your sin that much that you would forfeit your very soul for a season of vanity and pleasure?
Get a life.
Winston Churchill was wise, he believed the Bible – literally. He stood like a rock against Hitler and tyranny and he stood like a rock against liberal critics of God’s Word, the Bible.
Here is what he said: ‘We reject with scorn all those learned and labored myths that Moses was but a legendary figure upon whom the priesthood and the people hung their essential social, moral. and religious ordinances.
‘We believe that the most scientific view, the most up to date and rationalistic conception, will find its fullest satisfaction in taking the Bible’s story literally and in identifying one of the greatest human beings with the most decisively forward ever discernible in the human story.
‘We remain unmoved by the tomes of Professor Gradgrind and Dr Dryasdust. We may be sure that all these things happened just as they are set out according to holy writ.’