The famous astronomer and mathematician Sir Frederick Hoyle calculated the probability of the spontaneous generation of life:
No matter how large the environment one considers, life cannot have had a random beginning. Troops of monkeys thundering away at random on type writers could not have produced the works of Shakespeare, for the practical reason that the whole observable universe is not large enough to contain the necessary monkey hordes, the necessary typewriters, and certainly not the waste paper baskets required for the disposition of wrong attempts. The same is true for living material.
The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 noughts after it……it is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet or on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.
The last thing we want to have to think about is the reality of abortion–the human beings whose lives are being taken in the name ofchoice, healthcare, and equality.
The abortion industry fights hard to keep women and society in general in the dark about the reality of abortion. They do not want women to see their babies on an ultrasound screen, because when one sees a beating heart, kicking legs, waving arms, thumb-sucking, and yawning, it tends to burst the bubble of denial.
Many evolutionists have determined that the question of the origin of life on earth is answered by the idea known as Panspermia, Panspermia teaches that life floated down from outer space. Yes, these evolutionists are adults who drive automobiles!
The principles of biology cannot be reconciled with the claims of evolution. Consider this example from a biology textbook:
“Today we do not believe that life arises spontaneously from non-life. Life only comes from life but then how did the very first cell come about since this was the very first living thing? It had to come from non living chemicals.” Sylvia Mader, ‘Enquiry into Life’.
That is a complete contradiction. The author’s commitment to evolution results in an irrational and unscientific statement.